See this: http://called2account.com/

Dennis, Francine and I publish together

That's a feed aggregator site from the content you individually post on your separate blogs. Bully for you.

Er, because

a) Your stuff is continuously pretty hopeless and your position is largely compromised. For example, it is pretty unlikely you will ever argue against a tax system that requires fewer tax inspectors, now you have apparently taken their union’s shilling.

b) You pretty much don’t get the idea of blogs as a place for debate. You have pretty much got rid of dissent at your own place (hilariously using the ‘it’s my property’ defence, when at the same time criticising others on how they use their property). So any criticism (and there is room for plenty) must now happen outside your own blog.

c) You refuse to debate. At your own place you just hurl abuse and then complain about the level of abuse – when you set the example. You really just want to be surrounded by back slappers.

d) Here, instead of getting into Christie’s substantive critique, you pick some minor aspect of the post, and then use it as grounds to diss the entire post. It is how you typically operate, not a one-off.

See this: http://called2account.com/

Dennis, Francine and I publish together

Both also respect Prem

There's good reason to do so. He's been consistently right

And if my blog is so poor - why do you write about it so much?